Become a Member: Get Ad-Free Access to 3,000+ Reviews, Guides, & More

Watch wild Brazil motorcycle cop chase

Brazil cop chase police pursuit

A new video has emerged of motorcycle cop in a thrilling but highly dangerous motorcycle chase through the narrow streets and back alleys of Brazil.

The notorious police unit is called ROCAM which stands for Ronda Ostensiva com Apoio de Motocicletas in Portuguese and means “Ostensible Round with Motorcycle Support”.

The 7:36 minute video is a thrill a second, but like many similar ROCAM videos it has attracted a lot of negative comments about the dangers to the public of such police pursuits.

The video does not explain why police initiated the chase.

However, Brazil has high rates of violent crimes and is in the top 20 countries in the world for murder.

ROCAM is a group of select police deployed to fight drug and violent crime.

They work in groups of two and do specialised training every 15 days riding Yamaha and Honda motorcycles from 180cc up to the 647cc Honda Transalp.

The unit was formed in 1982 in Sao Paulo but there are now units all over Brazil.

Police pursuits

A leading police study has found the three most pressing issues for police reform around the world are use of force, policing of violence in families and high-speed pursuits.

A 2009 Australian Institute of Criminology study found deaths in custody at police stations are declining but “deaths in custody” as a result of high-speed pursuits were rising.

While less than 1% of police pursuits results in a fatal crash, 38% of the people killed are innocent bystanders.

It’s much worse in the USA where one person dies every day as a result of a police pursuit. Of those deaths, 1% are police, 55% suspects and 44% bystanders.

Most police procedures acknowledge the judgement of the officer at the scene to begin a pursuit.

However, continuation of the pursuit is then deferred to a senior officer at the station or headquarters.

They have to make a quick judgement based on the lethal risk to the community of the chase versus the lethal risk to the community of letting a serious offender escape.

This must be backed by information, not just mere suspicion.

Queensland police figures show only about 3% of pursuits involved imminent threat to life or a suspect escaping after a homicide.

Police have a duty to not only prevent and control crime, but more importantly, they have a duty to protect the community and that includes from their own reckless behaviour and judgement.

Click her to read about a police and media pursuit that encouraged a motorcycle rider to perform stunts for the cameras.

Police pursuit pursuits
TV chopper captures pursued rider performing stunts

Restrictive practices

Despite criticism from police unions, most pursuit policies around the world, including the USA, are becoming more restrictive.

In many jurisdictions, pursuits are only allowed if there is a serious risk to public safety or in relation to a major crime involving death or injury.

However, there is an issue about making these pursuit policies public. Some say they should be public to show transparency while others believe it would give criminals clues on how to evade police.

Those who support pursuits point out that the number of people evading police is rising as a result of more restrictive pursuit policies, despite higher penalties for evading police.

Making the issue more complex is the degree of the pursuit.

Should there be an upper speed limit for police? Should police be allowed to break other road rules in the pursuit?

There have been incidences of police driving at more than 200km/h in a pursuit and on the road side of a major highway.

Another issue is whether police should be criminally culpable in the instance of a death resulting from a pursuit.

To a degree, technologies such as CCTV and number plate recognition cameras, negate the need for pursuits, anyway.

* What do you think about police pursuits? Leave your comments below.

  1. “technologies such as CTV and number plate recognition cameras, negate the need for pursuits, anyway.”

    Absolutely – Everyone knows that all vehicle owners always keep all addresses up to date and that no one ever steals a bike or plates. BTW – what is CTV

  2. As these guys are ‘ROCAM is a group of select police deployed to fight drug and violent crime’ I think if they were trying to apprehend their ‘target audience’ a jgood on this guy. Not like we are talking a minor offence in all liklihood, and like so much of the scum probably on an unregistered or stolen bike that if they got away probably never seen again until theri next violent crime thus making a number plate recognition etc null and void. Job well done. Meanwhile they have left alone ‘joe average’ who is going a couple of kays over the posted limited and not hurting anyone.

  3. Should the police be criminally responsible for a death in a pursuit? No, I’d argue that should also be put on the perpetrator for choosing to run and cause a chase in the first place. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

  4. Depends on the crime and risks of the chase for sure.

    In the UK, crime where scooters were used went down by 50% when the police were allowed to bump the rider off. Before then it was an epidemic that got worse every month. So I can see the merits in some cases but having seen another video where French police rode on the pavement a lot, just missing pedestrians (and never caught the criminal)…I think there has to be some common sense prevailing.

    FWIW in the UK the cops had their hands tied for years until a politician had his mobile stolen by a moped criminal. Then the rules were changed within weeks….

Comments are closed.