More: wBW
Reviews Home
| Owner Comments (Below)
Many of you are still responding to the series
of motorcycle armor review articles we've published over the last year or
so.
Although we knew it all along, this just proves that
webBikeWorld visitors are extremely knowledgeable -- and concerned -- about
safety.
This pleases us to no end, because we've been on a
continuous crusade for motorcycle safety since the site was started about
seven years ago.
We started our journey into the world of protective
motorcycle clothing with a look at
the Bohn Coolguard system,
which I guess you could call "armored motorcycle underwear". Padded
motorcycle underwear is probably a more accurate term, but has, uh, other
connotations.
The underwear is actually just a carrier to hold the armor
in place and not really a full-functioning undergarment. The idea is
that the stretchy and tight-fitting fabric holds the padding and armor close
to the rider's body exactly where it can offer the best protection upon
impact.
I've found that if you can live with the extra time and
effort it takes to wiggle in and out of it, the underwear has the potential
of offering much better protection than the sometimes flimsy and almost
always too-loose-fitting armor and padding sewn inside motorcycle jackets
and pants.
We've also covered (if you'll pardon the pun) a variety
of back protectors, armored shirts and more -- click through the various
links in the column on the right to learn more.
And here we are, back to armored motorcycle underwear again!
This time, our friends at Motostrano kindly sent us a huge box full of Forcefield TPro Armourflex body armor (or "armour", as it's known on the
other side of the pond).
The Forcefield name is well known in Europe and the products
are also becoming popular in the U.S.A. Although many retailers still
sell the armor under the TPro brand name, Davies Odell (the company that
manufacturers the products) refers to the product only by the Forcefield
name.
The TPro brand name was apparently used for the technology
in the protectors, but Davies Odell now uses the "Armourflex"
label instead. The bottom line is that the protectors are simply referred to by the brand name
"Forcefield", so that's the name we'll use.
Forcefield armor has become popular for a several reasons,
including a 2005 RiDE magazine (UK) "Best Buy" designation after having passed
their back protector comparison tests with flying colors.
The Personal Protective Equipment Directive
Forcefield armor was also one of the first "soft" types of motorcycle
protective armor, offering potentially better flexibility and comfort to
street riders than the typical "hard" back protectors and other types
produced by much of the competition. Also, the Armourflex (aka TPro)
technology was also one of the first that met the tougher European Level 2
compliance standards for personal protective equipment (PPE) in Europe.
Level 2 compliance means that the protector has the
potential of transmitting less of an impact to the rider during a fall.
Note that the product must have the
official CE mark (Certificate of European Conformity) showing compliance to
Level 2 of the European
Personal Protective Equipment directive and it must be tested in an
independent lab, usin g the EN1621-2:2003
conformance testing standard
specifications.
Understanding the various standards, technical terms and
other jargon can make one's head spin, but it's important to get it right if
you're really looking for the best available protection.
If you're really interested, the Forcefield website has some information about
motorcycle armor and protectors.
Although there's an obvious conflict of
interest, they do a pretty good job at explaining what's important.
Also, one of the best articles I've read on the subject is on the
British Motorcycle Federation site. The article is entitled "Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) For Motorcyclists - A Briefing From The British
Motorcyclists Federation", and it discusses the history of protective
equipment and conformance standards.
Forcefield Armor Technology
But that's neither here nor there -- the bottom line is this: there are
really only three things motorcyclists need to be worried about: 1) Does it
work; 2) Is it comfortable and 3) How much does it cost?
Although no one has yet volunteered to jump off their bike
at 60MPH to give it a try, we'll have to take Forcefield's word for it on
the "Does it work?" question.
With regards to comfort, we did claim in our
review of the
original TPro Forcefield back protector, that it is "the most comfortable
and least obtrusive back protector we've tried". And as for
cost? Well, that's up to you to decide.
There's no question that the Armourflex technology used in
the Forcefield protectors is different; it's thinner and more flexible than
almost all of the competition and it gets its protective qualities from both the
"waffle" texture molded into the material and the composition of
the material itself.
Forcefield claims that Armourflex allows the
impact force to be
distributed more evenly across the surface, unlike (they claim)
other types of padding that can offer substandard levels of protection,
depending upon the exact location of the impact on the armor.
One of the benefits of Armourflex is the holes that are
formed into
the junction of each "X" in the waffle grid. This
theoretically provides more
air flow than other types of back protectors.
Granted, none of them are going to keep the rider as cool as he or she would
be without armor, but at least the Forcefield products do
offer the prospect of better air flow.
Another potential advantage of the Forcefield armor is its
ability to withstand repeated impacts. Some or most of the other brands
of armor can deform after
one sharp blow, which can reduce its ability to distribute additional impact force
that might be applied to the affected area.
Note that I'm not using the term "absorb" to describe what
happens during an impact. The protectors or armor don't really absorb
the force; rather, the material is designed to slow the rate at which the
force is transmitted to the rider.
Forcefield uses a good analogy to describe this: "A direct knee impact with the hard surface of the road or
ground is sharp and sudden, but a good impact protector compresses slowly
between you and the ground and spreads out the energy over a longer time.
Thus the protector reduces injuries.
Your kinetic energy still passes
to the ground, but slowly enough to not injure you or to dig a hole!
The differences in timescales involved are measured in milliseconds, but a
millisecond is a long time in the world of impact protection!"
A Variety of Options
The good news is that the interest and response from the motorcycle
community regarding proper riding gear has encouraged the manufacturers of
protective armor to develop all sorts of interesting options for actually
wearing the stuff. A
motorcyclist can customize his or her protection as required, even
augmenting the armor that comes with their jackets or pants by adding
kidney, rib, lumbar, shin, elbow and even head protectors to the mix.
But choosing the best combination can be confusing. The
basics include shoulder protection, elbow and forearm protection and knee and
shin protection. One could probably make an argument that back
protection is more important than anything else, but it's often overlooked. After that,
there's rib protection (important for dirt riders) and don't forget the
thighs, coccyx and chest.
So let's take a look at this potpourri of personal
protective products!

Forcefield Shirt
Armored shirts are popular with many motorcyclists. An armored
shirt can make the rider look buff (a joke, folks) while offering a
potentially higher level of protection
then the armor that is provided in the typical motorcycle jacket.
Unless the motorcycle jacket I'm wearing fits correctly
(that is, very tight) and has quality armor, I
usually depend on an armored shirt for protection.
I've recently tossed
the armor in one of my jackets and I wear the Forcefield shirt instead; it's
not only more comfortable, but the jacket fits better over the Forcefield
shirt than it did with the original flimsy armor that it came with.
The Forcefield shirt uses a different type of fabric than
the mesh in the Bohn Coolguard system.
Forcefield uses a combination of stretchy Lycra with DuPont
Coolmax behind some of the padding and in the flex points.
Lycra doesn't flow as much air as the mesh, but it
seems sturdier and makes it slightly easier to enter the shirt.
Forcefield includes a large section of what I assume is
Coolmax fabric mesh under each arm, extending down along the ribs and
another narrow section along the back of the arm along the back.
One of the problems with this type of close-fitting,
stretchy underwear is that the rider must take great care putting it on and taking
it off. It's easy to jam your foot into the wrong place or grab and
pull a leg in the wrong spot, which can cause the seams to tear.
It's better to put it on and take it off slowly, moving small areas of
fabric at a time.
The Forcefield shirt uses removable Armourflex in the shoulders,
for the elbow and forearm and a couple of smaller sections on each side of
the chest. The armor must be inserted by the owner when the package
arrives; it fits into the pockets sewn into the inside of the garment.
The armor can be removed when it comes time to wash the shirt.
Forcefield says that a triple layer version of Armourflex is also
available, but I can't find it listed on their website, so I'm not sure what
the difference is between it and the standard armor that comes in the shirt.
Many of you have asked about riding with this type of
underwear in hot weather. We experience much warmer weather over a longer period of
time in the U.S.A. than they do in the UK or even Europe, for that matter. Well, the
answer is yes; wearing any type of extra undergarment, especially one with
armor, does make you warmer, no question about it. I'd guess about 10
degrees (F) warmer, on average.
You'll have to decide if the tradeoffs
are worth the added level of protection or not. But remember that
generally speaking, this includes every type of motorcycle underwear, not
just Forcefield.
I normally take a men's size large and the size large
Forcefield shirt feels slightly big by maybe a half size or so, like maybe
it's a size 44 or 45. The shirt is available in sizes from XS to
XL. I probably could have gotten away with the medium; it's best to
wear this type of shirt so that it fits as tightly as possible without feeling uncomfortable.
The elbow armor feels like it has surprisingly more room in the cup that
surrounds the elbow than I'm used to, but this doesn't seem to be a problem if the motorcycle
jacket that I'm wearing over it fits tight enough. It gives me some extra room in the elbow
for moving around. I'm assuming that the extra room won't be a problem in case of a crash.


It's interesting to note that the elbow armor that came with
the shirt is labeled "small arm, small shoulder, small knee". I'm not
sure if this indicates that there are differently sized armor inserts
available? If so, I haven't seen them listed on the Forcefield or
Motostrano website.
I'm also surprised that the shirt doesn't have a pocket
for an optional back protector. Our Forcefield back protector insert
(see below) would have made a nice addition to the shirt, which would then
become a
perfect all-in-one upper body protective layer.
Overall, the Forcefield shirt is very comfortable and gives
me more confidence that the armor will stay in place and is higher quality
than the stuff that comes with many motorcycle jackets. The armor in
the Forcefield shirt meets EN1621-1:1998, EN1621-2:2003, EN13595-1:2002 and
EN340:2003.
Forcefield Action Pro Pants
The Forcefield pants are made with a fabric called "Meryl", which is
claimed to offer "breathability and outstanding
comfort".
The pants include several permanently attached Armourflex
panels on the outside of the thighs and along the rear. A smaller piece of Armourflex
is also provided, which is inserted into a pocket by the owner and which is
designed to cover the coccyx (lower spine).
I'm not sure why the removable panel isn't also permanently attached
to the outer fabric. It seemed to be located slightly too low in both the size large and
medium pants.
The pants have a Velcro fly, but for some reason the Velcro
doesn't extend all the way up to the waistband, leaving a slight gap.
This isn't a problem except when taking a photo! The shorts do not
have a fly.
The elastic waistband on the pants ends half-way around the
front and it does not extend around the back. The waistband at the back instead
uses a taller section of
the Meryl fabric, which is stretchy but doesn't seem to offer the same
amount of hold
as the elastic waistband in front. As a result, the pants feel like
they creep down in the back slightly when I wear them.
The Forcefield pants are comfortable and the Lycra-type
fabric helps provide some support. The pants don't include
corresponding mesh panels like those found in the shirt, so the pants can
tend to be slightly warm, although the panels behind the knee armor are made
from mesh.
The Forcefield pants meet the EN1621-1:1998, EN1621-2:2003, EN13595-1:2002 and EN340:2003
standards and are available in sizes S, M and L. I tried both sizes
and although they both fit, the medium felt more appropriate to my 35" waist, 31"
length body.
Forcefield Action Pro Plus Shorts
The pants are also available as shorts; they're called the Forcefield Action Pro
Plus shorts. They're made from Lycra and they are very easy to wear and
feel unobtrusive. These are a good solution for anyone whose leather or textile
pants have knee armor that fits but who desire better hip and thigh
protection.
The Armourflex padding is positioned in slightly different
locations on the shorts and it's all permanently attached, which I think
helps make the shorts so easy to put on and take off. The padding over
the coccyx is also permanently attached, but it also feels like it's
slightly too low. The elastic waistband continues all the way around
the shorts, which is a plus.
Rick wears the shorts under the
GiMoto
one-piece leather suit, which doesn't have much padding in the thighs,
hips and coccyx. The shorts are available in sizes XS through XL and
they meet EN1621-1:1998, EN1621-2:2003, EN13595-1:2002 and EN340:2003
standards.
 |
 |
|
Can the Rib Protector be worn in the front or
back? Wearing it in the front may help protect against
flying stones in off-road riding, while wearing it around the
back may help for street riding. |
Forcefield Rib Protector
The Forcefield Rib Protector, or Upper Torso Protector, is an interesting product. This is a
Level 1 approved protective device that Forcefield says can be used "for
those activities where the ribs are particularly vulnerable".
UPDATE: Our original photos of the model wearing the
Rib Protector were incorrect -- he was wearing it backwards! How
embarrassing...! But how was I to know that the elastic and Velcro
belt goes across the back rather than the front?! See the Owner
Comments below for more...
We also learned that the Rib Protector, when worn correctly,
is designed to work with a back protector. The Rib Protector is available in sizes small, medium and large;
the size large shown here is too big for
me, a medium should fit better.
The Rib Protector has adjustable elastic shoulder straps and
a wide, stretchy Velcro belt in front. This one is so big on me that
the Velcro just barely attaches in the front. I'd say the size large
should fit chest sizes of 45-46 and above, but overall, it feels a bit like
wearing a barrel.
Forcefield Back Protector Insert
Believe it or not, this was the product I was originally looking for
when I contacted Motostrano.
The fluff that passes for back armor in most motorcycle
jackets is horrendous. You'd think that the manufacturers would at
least offer an extra-cost upgrade to proper back armor. And you might
also think that back armor would all conform to similar shapes and
dimensions, but this isn't the case.
I wanted to get a back armor insert that would fit in my
3/4-length winter jacket in addition to my shorter leather and mesh jackets.
The Forcefield Back Protector Insert should be perfect, but I discovered
that the back armor pockets on every one of the motorcycle jackets I own are
differently shaped and the insert will not fit. I tried to fit it into
the Rev'it, Tourmaster (Cortech), Roadgear and Joe Rocket jackets without
success. What's up with that??
So here's our challenge to motorcycle apparel manufacturers:
how about standardizing on 1) A shape and size for back armor and 2) A
standard sized pocket in every jacket to fit the armor? Every jacket
could and should have a standardized pocket that would allow the owner to
insert a standard sized back armor insert if desired.
Yes, I know that back armor does come sized (usually S, M
and L), but surely the pockets on the jackets could also be sized
accordingly, based on the jacket size?
I even discovered that Rick's GiMoto suit does not have a
back armor pocket! We noticed a Velcro covered opening in the mesh
liner of the suit and figured it was for a back protector insert, but when
we opened it up we discovered that there was nothing underneath besides the
kangaroo leather.
In any case, I haven't given up; we're fortunate enough to
have a motorcycle leather and clothing tailor nearby and I plan on bringing
my jackets in to fit a pocket in each which will allow me to use the
Forcefield back protector insert.
The Forcefield Back Protector Insert comes in three sizes
and each is also available as a "Sport" version, which is thinner than the
original version.
Other than that, the Forcefield product is just as flexible
as the dedicated Forcefield back protector with shoulder straps
that we reviewed
previously.
Forcefield claims that Isle of Man TT road racers Ian Hutchinson (Honda) and Craig Atkinson,
(Manx winner) helped with the design of the the back inserts and chest
protectors.
Conclusion
Forcefield products are manufactured by a company that seems dedicated to
the cause and is focused specifically on the manufacture of high-quality protective armor for motorcyclists and
other outdoor activities. This alone gives me more confidence in the
products, especially since I'm not willing to evaluate them in a crash, so I
have to depend on subjective criteria like my comfort level with the
company's claims.
In addition, the Forcefield armor is
different than any of the others that I've tried and it does seem to offer a
higher level of comfort and flexibility. I wish the shirt had a
provision to incorporate the back protector insert and I also wish the
fabric had better breathability, but these are probably minor nitpicks,
common with
this type of equipment.
The bottom line is whether or not the product
will protect the rider when it's needed. I feel more comfortable and
secure wearing the close-fitting Forcefield armored clothing than I do with
the armor that is built in to most of the other motorcycle clothing I own.
| Product
Review: Forcefield Motorcycle Armor |
| Available
From:
Motostrano
(More information also available on the
Forcefield
website in the UK) |
Suggested
Retail Price: UK prices include VAT and shipping; Shirt -
£139.99 ; Pants - £89.99; shorts £74.99; Rib Protector - £49.99;
Back Protector Insert - Pro £29.99, Sport £24.99.
US prices don't include shipping or applicable sales tax; Shirt -
$225.00 ; Pants - $160.00; shorts $95.00; Rib Protector - $75.00;
Back Protector Insert - Pro $125.00. |
| Colors: Black |
Made
in: England |
| Review Date:
December 2006 |
Note: For informational use only. All material and
photographs are Copyright © webWorld International, LLC - 2000-2009. All
rights reserved. See the webBikeWorld®
Site Info
page. NOTE: Product specifications, features and details may
change or differ from our descriptions. Always check before purchasing. Read
the
Terms and Conditions!
►Reader Comments and
Owner Feedback
Please
send
comments to
Comments are ordered from most recent to oldest.
Not all comments will be posted. Posted comments may be edited.
From "S.C." (7/09): Sent an "email conversation
with Richard Andrews from ForceField Performance. Basically, some of
their chest protectors conform to EN Standard 14021:2003, which is a Stone
Sheild or deflector. SATRA confirms that back and chest protectors can
be certified to EN1621-2:2003. Mr. Andrews has noted that their Action
Shirt's chest pad conforms to EN1621-1:1998and thus is looking into removing
the EN1621-2:2003 certification for that product, since it also does not
come with a back protector."
From "T.L." (2/09): "When writing about the Rib
Protector, you note (in the Update above) that:
"Our original photos of the model wearing the Rib
Protector were incorrect -- he was wearing it backwards! How
embarrassing...! But how was I to know that the elastic and Velcro
belt goes across the back rather than the front?!"
However, when you go to the Forcefield website
here, you will note that the model has it on the way you originally had
depicted in the pictures with the Velcro on the front and not on the back.
So I am wondering which way is the correct way to wear it?"
Editor's Reply: Our review of the Forcefield armor
was published in 2006, and I recall getting an email from the U.S.
distributor telling me that the armor in the photo was backwards.
So I don't really know, but honestly, I think it can be worn either way.
They should have made it more obvious, or labeled the product in a way that
would tell the owner!
I think if you're wearing it for motocross/off-road, you'd
want the armor facing forward to protect against flying rocks.
Motocross riders use chest protectors, so the Forcefield armor would
probably work for this.
If you're riding on the street, turning it around might
provide extra back protection. Actually, now that I think about it, they
should be using this "reverso" feature as a marketing and sales point!
T.L. Follow-up: Apparently they were a
step ahead of your idea to market it both ways, I found a link where the
same T-Pro model is
wearing the rib protector both ways...
From "J.F.": "I contacted Tpro ... Thought you might be
interested that they confirm manufacture of Joe Rocket (Back Inserts) and
Halvarssons (Back Protectors)..."
From "J.F.": "Very detailed review on
the Forcefield Armor. I bought the Shirt, Pants and back protector a
few weeks ago. I must say we disagree on several key areas.
I love the back protector, though it does tend to sag after
a while riding due to the lack of secure adjustment systems meaning you need
to adjust it every time you use it.
The knee/elbow (which are identical pieces) and shoulder
armor however is horrible in my opinion. I find them very
uncomfortable against the bones present in my joints, and after a couple
hours wearing them find it causes a sore spots in each of these areas.
I retired them to my closet never to be seen again. I think this is
because of a lack of padding in the inside of the armor itself, it's very
rigid. I much prefer the armor in my Alpinestar or Icon jackets.
I guess I just wanted to let the other readers out there know their mileage
may vary with this product."
From "R.T.H.": "Great review on the
Forcefield product offering. I recently purchase the Forcefield Action
shorts which is the same material at the Shirt you reviewed. Think the
difference in the shorts is the newer ones have removable armor. Have
been very pleased with the comfort of the shorts.
Was concerned about the heat since I ride in Florida but
have found the shorts to be very cool. Also like the greater level of
protection under my bike pants. Did purchase loose Forcefield armor
for jacket shoulders, but agree that wearing the shirt would offer better
protection. Think that will be the next upgrade."