|
OGK FF-4
Aeroblade Helmet
wBW
Reviews Home
| Owner Comments (Below)
Remember the old ´70's
automobile commercials that extolled the "road hugging
weight" of the latest behemoth? I used to get a chuckle out
of those ads.
Let's face it -- if greater mass meant better
"road hugging" ability, then Michael Schumacher would be
driving a Kenworth!
The same can be said about motorcycle
helmets. If more weight meant more protection, then Valentino
Rossi would be wearing Captain Nemo's diving bell.
In fact, it's been argued that lighter
weight helmets (when properly designed, of course) can offer better
protection than heavier models. It gets into some of the physics that I
deliberately avoided during my misplaced youth, but I surmise that it has something to do
with mass times acceleration.
Which brings us to the OGK FF-4, which
is the latest evolution in the OGK line. The previous model OGK,
the FF-3, (read
the wBW FF-3 Review) is one of my all-time favorite helmets,
because it was light in weight, it fit my "earth" shaped
head like a glove, and it flows plenty of air.
The FF-4 improves
upon the FF-3 in a number of areas, especially in the quality of the
finish and in the styling. But the biggest difference in the
FF-4 is noticeable as soon as you take it out of the box; this helmet
is a real featherweight.
At 1409 grams (Euro version), the FF-4 is a full 210
grams (13%) lighter than the FF-3! This is astounding -- to get
this much of a weight reduction in an already lightweight helmet,
while still meeting Snell M2000 and the tough ECE 22.05 standards, is
revolutionary.
These are real-world weights I'm
talking about here that were measured in the webBikeWorld
"laboratory", not public relations fantasy weights provided by the
manufacturer's PR firms. Just for grins, I grabbed a batch of
helmets that we had on hand and weighed them for comparison purposes
with the FF-4.
As you can see from the table below, our FF-4 is actually closer in weight to
the open face HJC CL-5 than it is to the next lightest
helmet, the FM Force 10. Notice that most of the
helmets hover around the lower-to-mid 1600 gram
range. 1600 grams apparently is some type of
barrier, as many helmet manufacturers seem to have trouble
getting lower than 1600 grams and still meet the various
international safety standards. NOTE: Our helmet is
the European version; the U.S. version is apparently heavier, see the
note below in the Comments section.
Now don't get me wrong -- weight is an
important factor in a helmet, for a number of reasons. But I'm
not saying that lighter helmets are always safer, as they still need
to meet the necessary safety standards. Also, when a heavier
helmet is properly designed, its weight can be distributed with a lower center of gravity,
and this can help make its bulk less
noticeable.
See the
wBW
Motorcycle Helmet Weights page for a comparison
table and chart of helmet weights.
|
Helmet |
Size |
Weight
(grams) |
Weight
(lbs/oz) |
| HJC
CL-5 (Open Face) |
L |
1301 |
2
lbs. 13-7/8 oz. |
| OGK
FF-4 |
L |
1409 |
3
lbs. 1-3/4 oz. |
| Baehr
Silencer (FM F10) |
L |
1607 |
3
lbs. 8-3/4 oz. |
| KBC
VR-1 |
L |
1616 |
3
lbs. 9.0 oz. |
| OGK
FF-3 |
L |
1619 |
3
lbs. 9-1/8 oz. |
| Shoei
X-Eleven |
XL |
1635 |
3
lbs. 9-5/8 oz. |
| HJC
Sy-Max |
L |
1667 |
3
lbs. 10-3/4 oz. |
| Lazer
Century |
XL |
1710 |
3
lbs. 12-3/8 oz. |
The FF-4's light weight makes it more
comfortable to to wear. The lightness of the
FF-4 is noticeable when riding, which provides a sense of freedom,
especially when doing side-to-side traffic checks.
The lower
mass of the FF-4 is easier on my neck muscles, because I don't feel
like I'm trying to counter the higher resistance of a heavier helmet
felt when initiating a head turn and also when stopping the mass at
the end of the rotation. I believe this helps promote safer
riding, because it allows quicker head checks in traffic or when
making a sharp turn after a stop sign.
Visor
The FF-4 has a nice, wide visor opening. The sides of the
visor opening are way past the boundaries of my peripheral vision when
looking straight ahead. Better peripheral vision is safer; there
are a couple of intersections near my home where the cross traffic enters at an acute angle.
Most of the helmets that I've worn
have narrower visor openings, which means that I have to turn my head much
farther to see oncoming traffic.
A couple of helmets are so bad
that I literally have to put the bike in neutral to get my feet on the
ground so that I can pick my whole body up to turn and see what's
coming, and that's dangerous, especially when stopped on a hill!
It's no problem at all with the FF-4 at those same intersections; I've
found that I don't have to turn my head nearly as far, yet I can
see as far up the road as I'd like.
The FF-4's visor is easier to remove
and replace than any other helmet I've tried. I usually have to
dig out the owner's manual for other helmets to figure out how to
change the visor. The OGK "Quick Change Shield System"
is so ingenious, it's patented.
To change the visor, first raise it
to its highest level. Push the button on the side pod, pull, and
the visor comes right out with very little effort. To re-install
the visor, push it back in to the side pod until you hear the
"click". Simple as that. The standard OGK face shield
also comes with tear-off posts, and OGK provides a handful of tearoffs
and also a nice helmet bag with the FF-4.
Air Flow
OGK also has a patent for the ventilation system. It's called
the "Top Aero Ventilation System", which replaces the "Aeroblade
II" ventilation system used on the FF-3. The older system
used the low pressure created by air flowing through the Aeroblade
diffuser to pull air from inside the helmet.
The newer system
uses both positive and negative air pressure to flow the air.
The positive air flow forces air into the top of the helmet through
two holes near the front of the diffuser, and negative air pressure is
used towards the back of the diffuser to pull air through the helmet
and out the back.
The air exhausts out the back of the helmet
in the negative pressure zone created by the shape of the diffuser
(pink arrow, photo left). The air on the FF-4 now exits lower in the
rear of the helmet than the FF-3, and the shape of the diffuser provides greater
stability at speed by reducing buffeting. The Top Aero
Ventilation System can be shut off by sliding the two top
flush-mounted buttons forward (yellow arrow, photo left).
The rear exhaust vents are kind of
cool-looking; they are painted matte black inside, and they remind me
of the exhaust outlets on the F-117 Stealth fighter.
The FF-4 also has a slightly modified
version of the simple, yet effective, forehead and chinbar air vents
from the FF-3. The forehead vent is located in what appears
to be an aerodynamically designed recess. Some filtering
material lives in there to prevent the ingress of bugs or debris, and
the vent opens and closes with a more positive feel than on the
FF-3. The chinbar vent is also mounted flush with the helmet's
shell, and it provides a good flow of air to the rider's mouth and
cheek area.
Liner and Fit
I really liked both the liner and the fit of the FF-3, so it would be
hard to improve on that. The FF-4 uses a very similar lining,
which is removable and washable. It consists of separate pieces,
including the neck pad, cheek pads, and lining.
There are mesh openings
at the top of the lining, which allow air to freely pass on to and
over the rider's head. The material has a soft, velvety feel,
similar to the material used by Arai and others.
The chin strap pads can also be removed
for washing or replacement. The chin strap uses the simple yet
effective double D-ring closure system, and there's a nice button
provided to secure the loose end of the strap when riding.
I found that the FF-4 has a slightly
different fit than the FF-3. The FF-3 fits me better than any
other helmet I've ever tried. But the problem is that I
have what apparently is a rather strangely shaped head.
There are basically three head shapes: the so-called "long
oval", the "round", and one I've added, which I call
the "Earth" shape. My earth shaped head is widest
right above my ears at the temple area.
The FF-3 seemed to be
designed expressly for my Earth shaped noggin, but unfortunately for me, I'm
told that most humans have the "long oval" head shape.
I can only guess that the FF-3 didn't quite fit the long oval types,
and it seems to me that they've narrowed the sides just slightly on
the FF-4 to give it a more neutral fit that would suit a greater
majority of head shapes. I still like the fit, and it's more comfortable than
many other helmets, but it's just a wee bit tight for me on the sides,
although I'm sure it will get better as it breaks in.
Noise Levels
Evaluating helmet noise levels is extremely difficult. Helmets
that I've thought were quiet, others said were noisy. There are
several factors at play in evaluating helmet noise; for example, some
riders may be more sensitive to different frequencies.
I've
noticed that noise is usually generated in two different areas on a
helmet. Vents, openings, or the helmet's design can sometimes
cause a higher frequency "whooshing" sound over the top of
the helmet. Buffeting around the neck opening can cause a lower
frequency "booming" sound.
I've also found that most helmets would
be much quieter if closer attention was paid by the manufacturers to
the air flow around the neck.
The lower frequency sounds seem to be
more intrusive and louder, but can paradoxically be more easily controlled
by a properly fitting neck pad. I can usually
take one finger and place it up around the bottom of the neck pad and
decrease helmet noise by at least 50% or more.
It would be great
if the manufacturers made different shapes and sizes of replaceable
neck pads that allowed riders to customize the fit and decrease the
noise from this area.
In any case, I always use earplugs when
I ride, no matter what, and earplugs, when properly inserted, can
greatly reduce helmet noise levels.
I strongly recommend the use
of earplugs; please visit the webBikeWorld
Earplugs
and Hearing Protection page for more information on choosing and
wearing earplugs.
Some riders complained about the noise
levels of the FF-3, but I have not found that helmet to be any noisier than
most of the other race-oriented helmets (when wearing earplugs).
My opinion is that the FF-4 has slightly less noise than the FF-3 at
the higher frequencies.
I'm guessing that the new diffuser and
its nearly flush mounted buttons have reduced some of the noise
generated in that area. The FF-4 does seem to be slightly more
sensitive to buffeting around the neck opening, but this is only
apparent on some sportbikes or motorcycles with fairings or
windscreens that direct the "dirty" air right at the rider's
neck. The lower frequency sounds are not noticeable to me as a
significant noise generator when I'm riding a bike sans windscreen.
Again, if you choose to wear any helmet
without earplugs, all bets are off, and I can't tell you one way or
the other how the helmet will control noise, other than to tell you
that without correctly fitted earplugs, ALL helmets are way too noisy
in my opinion.
Other Features
The FF-4 is listed as meeting the Snell M2000 standards, according to
the latest Snell list on their website. The FF-4 also meets the
ECE 22.05 standard, and is BSI and ACU approved for racing. OGK
helmets are used by many motorcycle racers, the most famous of whom
might be Steve Hislop and the late, great Dave Jefferies (see the
webBikeWorld
memorial page to Big Dave). It would be really great to ride
with a Dave Jefferies replica FF-4 to honor his memory, as he will be
sorely missed.
The FF-4's shell is made from a
combination of fiberglass and carbon Kevlar fibers, which help account
for its low weight. The fit and finish of the FF-4 is a step up from the
FF-3, and the paint and graphics on the
"Graphic" model shown in these photos is first-rate.
It doesn't show up in the photos, but the darker grey areas of the
helmet have a really nice sort of "cloud smoke" pattern that
give it a nice 3-D feeling of depth.
Conclusion
OGK helmets are probably one of the best kept secrets around, and I
kind of like it that way. I believe the quality is on par with
the best helmets on the market. Many racers use OGK helmets, and
the FF-4 is a result of racer input from around the world. It's
great to see a company that's not afraid to continuously improve their
products.
But I think one of the neatest things about the FF-4
is that it sort of has a Zen-like simplicity to it. It's not
overloaded with wild features that add complexity, yet it provides all
of the functionality of its competitors and more. The light
weight of the FF-4 provides a liberating feeling when riding, and
other helmets feel bloated in comparison. If you're in the
market for a race-inspired lid, make sure you check this one out
before you make your decision!
Note: For informational use only. All material and
photographs are Copyright © webWorld International, LLC - 2001-2008. All
rights reserved. Read the
Terms and Conditions. See the webBikeWorld®
Site Info
page.
|
Product
Review: OGK FF-4
Aeroblade Helmet |
| Available
From: OGK
Helmets |
Made
in: Japan |
| Colors:
Black,
Gunmetal, White; Graphic with Silver, blue, yellow, or red;
Replicas for Steve Hislop or Dave Jeffries. |
Suggested
Retail Price: £249.99 (solids) to £349.99 (replicas). (Currency
converter) |
| Product
Comments: Extremely lightweight, flows lots of
air with patented system, visor very easy to remove and
replace, typical OGK comfort. The U.S. version meets Snell M2000, ECE 22.05
and AS-1698/AS1609 (Australia) standards, is BSI and ACU
approved. Approved for racing in FIM, AMA, FUSA,
WERA and more. |
Owner
Comments
From "M.": "As B.S. has
already mentioned (below) on the OGK FF-4 article, here in the
U.S. you can get the Snell/Dot approved helmet and it is indeed
heavier than the other specs. Even though it is not that
light I do find it to be a nice fitting and well made helmet
that fits my long oval shaped head well but with a few small
annoyances and those come from wind noise/venting.
I find depending on how I have my head is angled
I either get some high pitched whistling from the top vents or I
get the low boom effect coming in under the chin. I
usually get them at in town speeds (for me around 35-50mph) on
the highway moving at 60+ I don’t really notice it.
I guess venting could be better as well in my
opinion. I am in Florida where it is almost always hot and
muggy and I tend to get quite warm in this helmet compared to my
Arai RX7-RR3. For the record I ride a 2002 ZX6R and have a
Double Bubble windscreen which could be affecting the wind noise
in one way or the other. Anyway just thought I would give
my 2 cents on this helmet."
From "B.S.": "I bought an
OGK FF4 helmet partly on the strength of your review of it.
After receiving the helmet, I had a hard time detecting the
difference in weight between it and my old HJC AC-11. So I
got out a scale.
By my scale, the FF4 checked in at 1655g.
No lightweight here! Note that this one is Snell rather
than ECE. So, those of us in the States are once again
getting hosed by helmet makers hellbent on satisfying the
Snellions. Ah well. I'll give it a try, to see how the
ventilation and noise go, but I may also give up and switch to a
Shoei RF-1000 (marginally lighter, and way comfortable).
Perhaps it's worth noting on your review that
the USA version is not even close to 1400g?" |