Become a Member: Get Ad-Free Access to 3,000+ Reviews, Guides, & More

Why we should avoid cager road rage

This video from Florida is yet another great lesson in why motorcyclists should never take on drivers in a battle of road rage.

It started when the rider was splitting lane which is illegal in Florida. the driver took offence and a dangerous high-speed followed.

It ended with the driver spitting on the rider who responded by smashing the driver’s side mirror. Both men contacted police, and there is an ongoing investigation into the altercation.

It could have ended in disaster as two-wheeled bikes are simply no match a tonne or more of four-wheeled road rage.

Florida must be the capital of road rage, because in another incident we published in June a Florida driver intentionally ran over a motorcycle, sending the rider and his female pillion flying. They were taken to a hospital to be treated for minor injuries and later released.

Police arrested and charged the driver with attempted murder on the basis of the rider’s video evidence. But that doesn’t help the rider who is now nursing injuries and a broken bike.

Most riders have experienced aggressive, inconsiderate, rude, uneducated, distracted, dangerous and plain incompetent drivers on the road, but there is no point in road rage.

Motorcyclists are vulnerable road users and in road rage situations, we can often come off second-best, like the rider in this video.

Queensland Police Senior Sergeant Ian Park who created the #ridesafely4me Facebook site says he’s not sure if it is perception or reality, but “our roads appear to be becoming angrier places”.

“Unfortunately, it seems to involve individuals from all road user groups as both the victims and the perpetrators. Motorcyclists and bicyclists are of course the most vulnerable due to the lack of physical protection around them. But the fundamentals of personal safety of the roads are no different to anywhere else,” he says.

Queensland Police Senior Sergeant Ian Park a social media sensation
Sgt Park and a group of riders


If you find yourself feeling unsafe as a result of the actions of another road user, the first priority is to remove yourself from the situation as safely as possible. Unfortunately far too often incidents of poor behaviour by one road user to another are only exacerbated when the ‘victim’ retaliates. If another party chooses to yell at you, beep their horn or flash their lights – so what? Let them get it out of their system and get on their way. Inflaming the situation by ‘biting back’ rarely assists, and often only makes the situation more unsafe for everyone.

However if the other party continues to behave in a manner that makes you feel unsafe, then consider your environment. Perhaps pull into a service station, licensed premises or shopping centre that is likely to be fitted with external CCTV. This will often discourage the aggressor from taking the matter further if they know their actions (and registration details) are going to be recorded.

If no such place is available continue to drive without reacting to the aggressor until a place of safety is available, avoid making eye contact and attempt to disengage from the situation as best and safely as you can.

If you feel that you are in imminent danger, pull over and call triple zero (000). Don’t forget that ‘000’ from a mobile phone doesn’t necessarily go to your nearest operator, so always be ready to say ‘I need police in (name of City/town or nearest regional centre)’.

When speaking with a 000 operator, pass on relevant information that could assist police to investigate the matter, for example, registration details, descriptions of the person/s in the vehicle, time, date, correct location (in case there are traffic monitoring cameras located nearby etc.), descriptions about any features of the vehicle that are not standard (i.e. post factory fitted wheels, decorations, accessories, damage).

Emergency first-aid apps

If you carry any kind of video recording device, ensure the footage is set aside so that it doesn’t get recorded over before being provided to police. Make sure you don’t just secure the footage of the incident – also keep footage leading up to and beyond the incident to help clarify any potential counter claims by the other party that it was actually you that was the aggressor.

If the situation is over, but you are still of the belief that the matter warrants investigation with a view to action by police, you always have the right to report it. You can either attend your nearest open police station to speak to someone, contact the non-urgent police reporting number which is now 131 444 in almost all Australian Police Jurisdictions. Similarly most policing services across Australia also provide on-line reporting services. Just search the police service in your State or Territory to find their websites and follow the prompts.

Be mindful, however that any complaint of an incident involving one person upon another without any supporting evidence is often difficult to successfully prosecute. A successful prosecution requires sufficient evidence being presented to a court to determine that an offence was committed beyond reasonable doubt.

However, this should not prevent you from reporting the matter, but is something to keep in mind if police determine there is not sufficient evidence for a matter to proceed. It doesn’t necessarily mean police don’t believe you! If you provide police with a video recording you must be willing and able to give evidence.

  1. I think you would find the main factor in road rage is tailgaiting. which would
    also be a major factor in a lot of collisions I can think of several in my area alone
    that were caused by vehicles being shunted into oncoming traffic.
    Most of these stupid and aggressive drivers will be also the ones
    , flashing anyone they think is driving too slow ,and overtaking
    dangerously. Its all to easy to blame speed and put out more cameras

  2. If you have cameras make sure they have an accurate date and time stamp.
    If you take video to the police they may not accept it without such a watermark as there could be a claim of editing. If they take the footage from a wreck themselves it’s another story though.

  3. Roadrage is on the rise a a consequence of speedo gazing or the speed kills revenue raising excuse.
    Traffic used to flow and drivers could find their own pace and safely overtake those who traveled slower now with the fear of losing money and your license you can no longer just overtake that road hogging slow poke you have to sit and endure it until an overtaking lane appears or they turn off , but often you’ll get a slow road hog overtaking another slow road hog and leave you stuck behind. Add that to the increasing level of incompetence of today’s drivers and even trainers. Case in point, I was walking and had to cross the road at a roundabout having right of way I stepped onto the road in front of a learner car that was approaching the roundabout, instead of entering the roundabout the learner had to stop to let me past and the instructor started to abuse me until I informed him of the road rules and threatened to have his license revoked. This idiot was teaching so what hope do we have of lowering the road toll if all our safety campaigns are geared towards the people he and others like him teach.

    1. Hi Al,
      Similarly I had a professional taxi driver abuse me for filtering. I told him it was legal and that a professional driver like him should be aware of all the road rules.
      Seems anyone can get a taxi licence these days!

    2. Small, but important point Al. NO ONE has right of way. YOU are required to extend right of way based on the signs signals and markings you face. NOWHERE in the traffic act does it give anyone right of way. This is a common misconception.
      Also, the requirement to extend courtesy was removed a few years back.

      1. Sorry but that’s not exactly correct. It may not be specified that someone has right of way in the words “this ……… Has right of way” but it does say giveway to …….. When etc etc. and under the particular circumstances I mentioned the car driver had to give way to me therefore I had right of way!
        And the fines and compensation payments would have proved it had the car not stopped. Right of way is implied by the other being required to giveway. There used to be an exception to this it may not have even been written as such but it went like this, pedestrians have right of way period!
        This was removed stupidly not long ago in QLD and in its place there’s something along the lines of “giveway to pedestrians if there is a chance of an accident “. Now someone with common sense would realise that when it involves pedestrians there is always a chance of an accident so keep clear and give way to them etc where as others clip your heals as you cross at a marked pedestrian crossing. Another anecdote, I took my mother to the shops and as she was getting out of the car some clown who was old enough to know better raced into the parking spot beside her, had she opened the door fully or tripped as an elderly person might or even step out into what was an empty space she could have been killed or very badly injured. The abuse that moron copped was very well deserved but the really sad part was he didn’t have a clue what he did wrong I had to explain it to him.

        1. As I said, NO ONE has right of way implied or otherwise. Looks like we’ll have to agree to disagree.

Comments are closed.