The Konda comes in a limited array of colors, including white, black (and variations thereof) and the very nice silver shown here.
The paint on this example is outstanding, with a perfectly applied finish with tiny little metallic flakes that can be seen in the video close-ups (below).
Caberg also uses what we can only term as a “hard” clearcoat finish, something we have mentioned before in webBikeWorld reviews.
There is something about the clearcoat used by Caberg and a few other European helmet manufacturers seems different from the “softer” clearcoat formula used on other helmets we’ve reviewed.
The clearcoat protecting the helmet’s surface doesn’t necessarily look thicker than average, but it has a different feel.
I can tap my fingernails on it and it just feels hard to me and, based on my experience with other Caberg helmets, it should protect the helmet better than the surface finished on other helmets I’ve owned.
One of the best compliments I can give the Konda is that I don’t feel like I’m wearing a flip-up when riding — at least not after I lower and secure the hatch, so to speak.
The moving bits and pieces on the Konda feel nice and firm, without a lot of the squeaking and groaning noises heard on other brands of flip-ups I’ve worn.
The rotating visor has a quality feel when it’s raised and lowered with the soft-touch button located right in the middle of the chin bar where it’s easy to find.
The visor also has a strong detent at the top, so it should remain firmly in the raised position during those fuel and Mars bar (aka Snickers in Yank-ese) stops.
The liner in the Konda may not be as plush as a £600 Arai RX-7, but it’s nicely made and assembled into the helmet. Finally, the vents and other parts all work as expected with no flaws to report.
The large and unique-looking clear face shield fits snugly against the eye port gasket, although there are slight gaps at either side that will allow some water to enter.
That should be a rare occurrence though, as the shield has molded-in guards at the top and the gaps in the gasket are at the farthest end of each side.
Score: The Caberg Konda gets an “Outstanding” rating from me for overall for quality. See the Summary Table at the end of this page for a description of our rating system.
The reason I know this is that we’re currently also evaluating a pair of C3’s complete with the SCHUBERTH Bluetooth communication system and that review will be published soon.
The big difference though is that a size large for the Caberg Konda is listed as 59-60 cm, while the size large for the SCHUBERTH is listed as 58-59.
I’d guess that SCHUBERTH tried to squeeze a large into a medium shell size, because it has to be the smallest-feeling size large I think I’ve ever tried.
On the other hand, the Konda with its 59-60 cm fit feels generous and I think a 61 cm head should also be able to fit. The helmet does feel slightly top heavy, as do most flip-ups in my experience.
This is minimized somewhat when the rotating visor is lowered and locked, but the dramatic cut of the eye port (description to follow) also adds to the feeling that the helmet is sitting a bit high.
The shape is just to the round side of neutral, so I’ll call it a “Slight Round”.
But it should fit the widest majority of head shapes with no problems, as long as the potential owner’s head profile isn’t too far from average.
The Konda liner is removable, but I’m not sure if Caberg sells different size cheek pads and liners to make a more custom fit.
The helmet is available in sizes ranging from XS to XL only, so no XXL for the Konda.
I’ll give the Konda a “Slight Round” shape designator in the Estimator chart above; similar also, by the way, to the AGV T-2 full-face helmet that was just reviewed also. As always, note that different head shapes and different helmet sizes can cause a helmet to fit or feel differently than I am describing here, depending upon the individual.
There is one big difference, however. The Konda does have a tight front-to-back internal fit, so my chin touches the back of the chin bar inside the helmet.
The padding inside the chin bar feels thicker than average, but the internal dimensions may be an issue with some riders, depending upon their head or chin shape.
Otherwise, the clear face shield also operates smoothly and it has outstanding optical qualities. It has 5 detents and the first opening is a bit larger than I’d like, but it snaps open and closed with a good feel, so I’m pleased.
The lifting tab is located at the center of the face shield, making it easy to reach with either hand.
The face shield measures 2.05 mm thick with our micrometer.
It is rather easy to remove; just rotate it upwards until the two molded-in arrows meet (see photo above) and push the release button towards the rear and the shield will release.
The face shield is coated to help prevent fogging and it’s also treated with an anti-scratch coating.
The anti-fog treatment seems to work in the limited range of warmer temperatures I experienced during the evaluation, but UK owners may want to secure a bottle of Clarity Defog It (review) just in case — it’s the best anti-fog treatment we’ve used so far.
Internal Sun Shield
The Konda also features an inner rotating sun shield. It operates with a rather large slider on top of the helmet that is placed as part of the top vent assembly.
The slider is a friction unit, so the sun shield can be stopped at any position, which is a definite plus. It doesn’t rotate down quite as far as I’d like.
But it is just below my line of sight and the scalloped edge along the bottom is relatively shallow so it works pretty well.
I like having the ability to stop the sun shield above my eyes, which helps when the sun is bright and overhead or when riding into the setting sun in the evening.
Score: Overall, the mechanical system for the rotating visor and clear face shield on the Caberg Konda I would rate as “Excellent”, with the internal sun visor as a “Neutral”.
The Konda has a basic ventilation system, wit
that large chin vent flowing air up on to the back of the clear face shield only, through three channels along the top of the chin bar.
The helmet does not have an on/off slider switch for the chin vent, so the vent can not be closed.
This isn’t much of an issue though, because ventilation is almost always necessary and since there are no direct air channels through the chin bar itself, the air flowing in along the top of the chin bar is the only ventilation available.
The tight front-to-back dimensions inside the helmet and the large and tall chin bar result in some close quarters around my mouth.
This is especially noticeable at slower speeds in warmer weather, where it can get pretty warm inside.
It would have been nice if there were vent channels directly through the chin bar, but this is a rare feature on flip-up helmets.
The top vent is covered by a small slider at the front of the assembly that also houses the slider for the internally rotating sun shade.
The entry hole for the air flow is small and the air must go up and over the lip of the assembly to enter the helmet.
Also, the helmet has no rear exhaust vents, so there isn’t much to pull the air through.
Nevertheless, the helmet seems to have about average air flow anyway, which probably illustrates that either the other helmets with all their fancy ducting work are just for show, or the Konda’s system has more intelligence than I’m giving it credit for.
This said, I haven’t tried it on a really hot day yet — our cooler Spring temperatures can mask the efficiency of a helmet venting system.
Score: The always-on chin vent system on the Caberg Konda gets a score of “Good” and would probably be better if air was directed through the chin bar itself. The top vent and lack of a pull-through exhaust system gets lower marks.
The Konda seems to follow what is apparently a new trend in design that we’ve noticed lately; the profile has a dropped chin and raised back, which is more apparent when looking at the helmet from the side.
It’s not quite as dramatic on the Konda as on some other helmets I’ve worn recently, and this design may be to help keep the back of the helmet from fouling against jacket collars when in the leaned-over Sportbike riding position.
This wouldn’t be a problem but if this is in fact a new design trend, then it may be necessary for the manufacturers to consider making the padding at the bottom of the helmet (the so-called “neck roll”) thicker.
This could fill the gap that forms between the rider’s head and the inside rear of the helmet.
The rear of the helmet is in the high-turbulence area and any area that isn’t sealed will allow noise to enter.
This seems to be the case with the Konda, although this also depends quite a bit on the match of the helmet to the rider’s head shape — yet another reason why finding the perfect fit is so important.
I notice an increased volume around the back of the helmet and the source is quickly identified by placing a hand back there, and the noise is immediately diminished.
The noise doesn’t really diminish even when riding in a more straight-up sitting position on a bike without a windscreen.
So I’d have to say that in general the Konda seems to transmit more noise than average around the bottom of the helmet, with the upper portion of the helmet having the average amount of wind noise that is common with any helmet design.
Note that our helmet evaluations are a combined effort of several riders over time on different types of motorcycles with and without windscreens.
Evaluators wear correctly fitted, high quality ear plugs (even when evaluating motorcycle intercom systems).
Always protect your hearing when riding a motorcycle. See the wBWEarplug Reviews for more information on choosing and wearing earplugs.
Note also that perceived noise levels will vary, depending on the individual.
Noise can be caused by many factors, including helmet fit, the type of motorcycle and windscreen, wind speed and direction and even the rider’s clothing.
Score: Overall, my feeling is that the Caberg Konda is slightly louder than average but this may depend upon the fit of the rider’s head to the helmet and other factors, so I’ll give it a “Neutral” score.
wBW Video: Caberg Konda Helmet
The size L Caberg Konda shown here weighs a comparatively light (for a flip-up) 1755 grams (3.0 lbs. 13-7/8.0 oz.), which, although heavy compared to a full-face helmet, isn’t bad actually.
The Konda uses the European-style quick release buckle, which works fine but my preference is for a double D-ring system.
The ear pockets feel slightly smaller than average in their dimensions, including depth, although the helmet is ready for the Caberg “Just Listen” Bluetooth communication system.
The T-2 meets ECE 22.05 safety standards only and ACU Gold approval (not confirmed) in the UK.
The Caberg Konda is a great-looking helmet that should satisfy anyone looking for style and not finding it in most of the flip-up helmets available today. Is it an improvement over the Trip?
We unfortunately no longer have a Trip for comparison, but if memory serves me correctly, I can say that the Konda has better overall quality (some Trip owners complained about that issue) but the Konda isn’t as quiet as the trip.
But in the end, the Konda is a worthy replacement for the Trip and the combination of style and design and the lower price point compared to other flip-ups makes it a worthy choice.