Under Armour HeatGear Metal
vs. Wal-Mart
Motorcycle Wicking Underwear
by Rick K. for webBikeWorld.com
wBW
Reviews Home
Summary: Tight flexible wicking underwear claimed to be "the
leader in heat dispersion - keeping you cooler and more comfortable than the
competition." It's expensive and it's hard for me to tell if it
works as claimed. Also tried: the Wal-Mart Athletic Works moisture
wicking T-shirt.
This summer has been hotter than an exhaust valve on Casey Stoner's
Desmosedici, and an extended drought hasn't helped,
making an all-out search for cool clothing a top
priority.
During the search, long-time webBikeWorld visitor "L.S."
dropped me a line (or two) and recommended Under Armour HeatGear
Metal wicking underwear as the way to go. Parts of
our virtual conversation are included in the comments
section below.
In case you don't know, Under Armour has been flying off the shelves
and on to the backs of those who need it and many who
don't.
It's the Next Big Thing and it's here and now -- Under
Armour is hot, if you'll pardon the pun. No
longer just for locker room brutes, Under Armour
gear is in, big time, and on the hook for its 15 minutes
of fame.
How do I know this? Catch the buzz in the 15-
to 20-year-old crowd and you'll see what I mean.
It's a must-have for back-to-school wear '07.
So what is this stuff? Here's the elevator
speech, direct from Under Armour's marketeers:
"Founded in 1996 by former University of Maryland
football player Kevin Plank, Under Armour is the
originator of performance apparel - gear engineered to
keep athletes cool, dry and light throughout the course
of a game, practice or workout. The technology behind
Under Armour's diverse product assortment for men, women
and youth is complex, but the program for reaping the
benefits is simple: wear HeatGear when it's hot, ColdGear when it's cold, and AllSeasonGear between the
extremes."
Well, I'm not so sure about the "originator of
performance apparel" boast, but Under Armour started by
making a new take on the plain ol' T-shirt, but designed
to help keep athletes cool on hot, sticky playing
fields in the American South.
Apparently, Kevin Plank investigated a
bunch of materials and came up with what is now the
"compression" shirt (and clothing), made from a
combination of Polyester and Elastane (in an 82/18%
mix). The clothing -- or in our case -- the
T-shirt and underpants -- must be worn tight against the body
for best effect (although the company has looser-fitting
garments in
their now-huge product line).
The "compression" fit and the high-tech fabric is
supposed to "wick perspiration off your skin rather than
absorb it" and "regulate temperature and enhance
performance". I think what they mean by the
somewhat tortured grammar with the "absorb"
reference is the
tendency of cotton underwear to absorb and holding the
moisture, which can make the wearer feel like a wet
Spaniel.
The brand has become popular faster than you can say
"Ducati", and who better to do the
underground promotion thing than in-the-news athletes.
Over the past 10 years, Under Armour's
product line has grown in leaps and bounds; it now
includes a
stunning array of products, sizes, shapes and forms, all
built on that basic T-shirt. Clothing, socks,
jackets, fleece, eyewear, luggage and even shoes now
carry the brand, and they're designed for summer, winter and in-between.
The Wall Street mythmakers (Under Armour is a
publicly traded company) claim that everyone from Adidas to Nike to
Wal-Mart was caught off guard and most are still trying
to catch up. And there may be some truth to this: according to my
in-the-know consultant friends, Under Armour
has a superior product development strategy and the manufacturing
tactics to match, which has so far allowed them to
stay far out in front.
That's all well and good, but what about this summer's relentless
heat wave and possible solutions?
I'm not fond of
riding when the temperature soars above 90 F (32 C), or
even 85, truth be told. "If it's too hot for
leather, it's too hot for riding", as the saying
goes, but I'm not that much of a purist,
although even in extreme heat, I make it a point to try and wear the most
protective gear I can possibly suffer, covered from head to toe.
No jeans for me....
But once it gets over 85, I'm usually wearing some type of meshy
textile, although even then, it's borderline torture
unless I'm
moving. Fast.
We've reviewed several other types of what I can only
call "motorcycle underwear" over the past few
years; see the column
on the right-hand side for links to our review articles.
The garment that seems most similar to the Under Armour
concept, however, is the Dri-Duke wicking shirt, which
we reviewed one year ago, and it actually did seem
to work.
A variety of other wicking underwear products have
also been reviewed by various webBikeWorld evaluators, but,
to be honest, I'm 60/40 on the concept; I just can't
seem to confirm to myself whether the stuff makes me
feel cooler, hotter or none of the above.
After all, putting on a
full-length layer of skin-tight undies, hoping to get
cool in 90+ degree weather seems counterintuitive.
Although I will say that one thing that most of these
moisture wicking garments do very nicely is to help
control moisture when they're worn under leathers.
And they usually make it much easier to get a set of dry
leathers on and a sweaty ones off.
You want true cooling power for real? See our
review of the
Silver Eagle cooling vest,
which really does work, as long as you're willing to
ride around feeling like that wet Spaniel is curled up
around your rib cage. And by the way, it's one
thing to remove moisture from the outside, but don't
forget to keep the moisture going down the inside!
How? Read our review of the
CamelBak
hydration backpack.
So, in the interest of science (and at L.S.'s
prompting), I bought an Under Armour HeatGear Metal
T-shirt ($49.99), and wore it in a variety of conditions
during the Wave of Heat we've been experiencing. A
few weeks later, I also purchased a pair of Under Armour
HeatGear "leggings" (e.g., long underwear) for another
$49.99 and tried the combination. The total cost
of this outfit came to about $115.00, including tax and
shipping.
Then to complicate matters, I discovered a
suspiciously similar-looking $9.99 "Athletic Works"
wicking undershirt in Wal-Mart. Although it
certainly doesn't have the fancy stitching of the Under
Armour product, and it's nowhere near as flexy, the
label shows nearly the exact same ingredients: 81%
Polyester and 19% Elastane. Could this be an 80%
cheaper equivalent of the fancy Under Armour gear?
And I also had a
Holofiber
moisture wicking T-shirt hanging around, so I tried
that also.
My answer? Sorry folks -- I just don't know.
After trying all of the new and old wicking underwear
clothing, I honestly can't tell if the stuff makes
riding in white-hot weather any better or any worse than
a tried-and-true T-shirt. I'm sure we'll get a
variety of opinions on this one, most telling me I'm
nuts, but I can't seem to tell one way or another
whether this stuff really works or not.
It's extremely difficult, if not impossible, to
objectively prove it one way or the other. I
think I can feel a difference when wearing the Under
Armour -- that is, at least the HeatGear Metal T-shirt.
I can't tell a thing when wearing the "leggings", other
than they make me feel hotter and like less cooling air
is getting through to my skin.

Beautiful and high-quality stitching on the Under Armour
HeatGear Metal T-shirt.
 
The Wal-Mart $9.99 Athletic Works T-shirt is clalimed to
be made from the same fabrics as
Under Armour HeatGear, but it's not cut to fit as well
as the HeatGear T and the fabric
feels much less flexible.

Wal-Mart Athletic Works wicking T-shirt (left) vs. Under
Armour HeatGear Metal (right)

I'll need to buy a mannequin. No one wanted to
pose with these
ultra-tight Under Armour HeatGear Leggings.
I've worn the Under Armour, the Wal-Mart Special, and
the Holofiber T-shirt, wearing each one under textile
and perforated leather and all in very hot and humid,
90+ degree riding weather.
If I was forced to do a ranking, I'd say the Under
Armour and Dri-Duke shirt feel equivalent, but since the
Dri-Duke can be had for about $25.00, it's
potentially a better deal.
The Wal-Mart shirt is maybe next, although it's hard
for me to tell if it's any better or worse than the
others. Holofiber does nothing but make me feel
hotter and a Fruit of the Loom cotton T-shirt is
somewhere in between.
Yes, the cotton T-shirt does feel like it holds the
moisture more than the Dri-Duke and the Under Armour,
but once I'm up to speed with a mesh or perforated
leather jacket on top, I'm not sure if I feel any
difference.
I sort of wonder if there's a little bit of the
glamour effect at work here -- that is, pay 50 bucks for
an ultra-chic and fashionable T-shirt that all the star
athletes wear and you'll convince yourself that it
really does work? I know, I know -- I'm being way
too cynical...
So that's why this review has no conclusion -- you
tell me what you think and we'll post it in the comments
section below.
And remember this is only me speaking -- my opinion
and only my opinion. I know L.S. for sure doesn't
agree with me, so I've seeded the comments section below
with an edited version of his correspondence.
| Product
Review: Under Armour HeatGear Metal Motorcycle Wicking Underwear |
| Available
From:
Under Armour |
Suggested
Retail Price: $49.99 |
| Colors: Many colors and styles. |
Made
in: Mexico |
| Review Date:
September 2007 |
|
|
Note: For informational use only. All material and
photographs are Copyright © webWorld International, LLC - 2000-2008. All
rights reserved. Read the
Terms and Conditions. See the webBikeWorld®
Site Info
page.
►Owner Comments
Comments? Send them to
Comments are ordered from most recent to oldest.
From "R.E.": "I bought the expensive Under Armour and wore
it in 90+ degree riding a few times. I don't notice any temperature
differences but I do notice I'm dry at the end of a ride. But no
difference in terms of coolness. It does make wearing leathers easier
though, both because of allowing the leathers to go on and off easier and
because you stay drier underneath. But these are not some "magic" items
that are going to all of a sudden make you cool when riding in hot weather."
From "B.M.": "I tried the cheaper Under Armour HeatGear
compression shirt and shorts this August. At $25 each they're a pretty
reasonable purchase. I found the shirt did help me stay cooler, compared
to a T-Shirt. Not like air-conditioning, but I think it did make a
noticeable difference.
The shorts, on the other hand, I really liked a lot. Partly because of
their wicking properties, but mostly because of their compression feature.
My butt could definitely stay in the saddle longer than when wearing plain
cotton shorts. Several of my riding companions swear by
LD Comfort brand shorts."
From "C.C.": "The best summer biking shirt for the buck is
Duluth Trading Company's Performance Longtail T. I used to wear Under
Armour exclusively when riding as it is great at keeping me from getting sweat
soaked in the summer here in the southeast. However, price and ultimately
the fact that is too short when I crouch down on my bike exposing my backside on
more than one occasion had me looking elsewhere. I finally ran into
this little piece of heaven.
Basically a snug fit T-Shirt that is about 3 inches longer than
a traditional T and is built out of non-absorbent materials. They also
have it in very large sizes and if you buy it in 2+ quantities they are priced
at a very reasonable $17.50. These shirts are built tough as they are
designed to be used on the construction site and I have yet to run into any
problems with one.
Another nice bonus is they look like a normal T and not a super
tight form fitting shirt. They don't wick as well, but these shirts breath
better. I wear them exclusively now when motorcycling, hiking and
kayaking.
I have yet to find a single item worn by them that is
uncomfortable or has an odd cut. Their items are durable and exceedingly
comfortable. Also, they are a great resource for cold weather riding as
well. Some of their undergarments are king in my book when the temps start
dropping below 60 and getting close to 40.
BTW, I am not affiliated with Duluth Trading Company in any way.
Just a big fan of their clothing lines."
From "M.R.": "FWIW Silk and natural fibers are better for
motorcyclists in one more aspect.
If you go down and have a spill, the Nylon or Polyester products
can (and do) melt to your skin (say if you're wearing leathers on the outside
and heat generated from a slide), causing not only burns to go along with other
possible injuries. Also, sitting around a campfire they won't get holes in
them from floating ash or sparks…
Don't ask me how I know..."
From "D.C.": "I also have a mixed bag. The top coming from Wal-Mart,
and the bottoms purchased in REI’s bicycle section. I was going to go back
and get the top, but on a trip from the S.F Bay area to the High Sierra Vulcan
Riders motorcycle rally last June, they both worked just fine.
I also must admit that I don’t wear mine super “skin tight, but
rather “stretched comfortably”. With jeans and chaps, plus a shirt and
leather jacket I thought like most, that this set up would so hot, I’d be at the
first Denny’s for a quick change. No so friends and neighbors.
From the early morning coolness near the coast to the mid day
heat of Nevada, I was just fine. The only time I felt the heat was when I
stopped for gas and a break. I ride from 45 to 95 and just vary the under
layers. The outer stuff is always the same. I have had road rash and
it stinks."
From "B.B.": "I used some flyweight silk long underwear to
keep my 20 lb. Langlitz leathers off my skin during a blazing hot 4500 mile trip
down the left coast this July. These are available at Mountain Equipment
Co-Op or other good mountaineering stores.
I dislike synthetic materials,
especially Coolmax, because they get stinky and retain the stink despite
washing. My silks kept me dry and cool without getting smelly, despite not
washing them for days.
Another nice thing about silk underwear is that it retains water longer than
synthetic, allowing for better soaking and evaporation, which is probably more
useful as a cooling aid than wicking. I've always felt that fabric that
wicks away water from your skin will make you hotter, not cooler, as your skin
does not feel the evaporative effect."
From "J.G.": "I would highly recommend the Nike Dri-Fit line
of wicking shirts. I have used them during various cross country trips,
and they work really well. They also have a much silkier texture than the
(Under Armour) which feel scratchy in comparison. I bought them for $25.00
at Sports Authority."
From "J": "Saw your review on the Under Armour stuff.
I passed on that pricey stuff and have the el cheepo Wally world long sleeve
knock off (I think I paid $15 last year on sale). I have worn it in 90+
degrees under a perforated leather jacket and it feels better with that than a
cotton t-shirt. What is really wild is taking off the jacket at gas stops
if there is a nice breeze. The air flow just sucks the heat right out of
you with this stretchy thing on. Leathers slide right off also....."
From "L.S.": "Rick, I rode with my Under Armour Heatgear
Metal long sleeve T-Shirt for the first time on Wednesday. In a word:
Fantastic.
I rode in to work in the morning, wearing my Olympia Airglide 2
mesh jacket over the Under Armour. With the temp at about 70 degrees in
the morning, that was cold. I'll have to experiment further and see what
the lowest comfortable temp is (next time, I'll wear a regular long sleeve
polypro T in the morning).
But in the afternoon, I rode home in 94 degree humid weather.
The (BMW) K12R has an outside temperature indicator as part of the display on
the electronic digital instrument panel, and I can now guess the outside temp to
about 1-2 degrees accuracy. I can immediately tell even a 1 degree change
in the temp as I ride through different climes.
Wearing the Under Armour Metal T, the 94 degree temperature felt
more like the low 80's. Not a drop of sweat stuck to me, and I was totally
comfortable under the Olympia jacket. When I got home and took the T shirt
off, the back of it, made out of a stretchy mesh material, was clearly wet with
sweat, while the front was bone dry. I felt a little sweaty, but was
actually mostly dry.
(This) emphasizes again that in order to get the benefit from
wicking clothing, the garment has to be skin tight, and cover all the areas that
you want to shed moisture from. So don't make the mistake of wearing an
Under Armour HeatGear short sleeve T either. It's gotta be the long
sleeve, and it's gotta be skin tight.
I also have an Under Armour HeatGear long compression pant which
I wore down in North Carolina in early June at the BMW rally. Temps were
in the mid-upper 90's to my recollection, and I was perfectly fine wearing those
under my mesh pants. Too bad I didn't have the T shirt to go with them.
From previous experience, I'd decided that temps above about
86-87 degrees were too hot to ride in. Wearing the Under Armour T, I
should be able to extend that up to the upper 90's. I'll write further as
the summer goes on."
And:
"I made the mistake of thinking that
loose-fitting shirts would be more comfortable, and therefore buying most of my
wicking gear in non-skin tight sizes. I must have half a dozen shirts that
are therefore fine for cooler weather, but no good for summer.
And really, those shirts are even
deficient in cooler weather, because while I'm in the house, I'll sweat a
little, and the sweat will stay on my back until I'm on the bike for a while.
So for the first few miles, I'll be uncomfortable while the cold sweat is drying
out. If the shirts were skin tight, the sweat wouldn't be on my back and
it'd be much better.
I don't think that every wicking shirt
needs to be the exact type of skin tight fabric that the Under Armour HeatGear
Metal T is. But if you want to stay comfortable in hot OR cold weather,
and eliminate that hot or cold sweat feeling, there has to be effective wicking
from the entire body surface, which is only accomplished when the fabric is
tightly sticking to your skin, whatever kind of wicking fabric it may be.
Looks like I'm gonna have to buy myself a whole new wardrobe of wicking
shirts..."
And:
"Rick, I did an interesting experiment
yesterday. Temps about 90. I rode to one of the local dealers in a
medium weight, skin tight wicking long sleeve T. As soon as I got off my
bike, I started to sweat. Went into the bathroom there and changed into my
Under Armour long sleeve metal T. Much cooler, and when I got on my bike,
the temp felt about 10-12 degrees less than in the other wicking shirt.
By the way, I wear a 43-44 Long suit
jacket and ordered a (Large) and an XL Under Armour T. Both fit, but the
(large) was very skin tight so I kept the XL. It seemed to me at the time
that you can easily go up a size in this type of skin tight fabric and still get
the benefit of a shirt that clings, and therefore wicks at maximum rate.
However, I'm not 100% sure of that because I didn't directly compare both under
wicking conditions, only from the standpoint of fit."
|